Showing posts with label Patents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patents. Show all posts

Monday, December 13, 2021

The Big Deal in the Realm of Patents: From TPP to CPTPP

 The provisions concerning Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) were rationalized by the enforcement of the Agreement on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). In addition to this Agreement, since all countries, developed and developing, alike have substantially grown and witnessed development in the manner of implementing provisions for providing in times of health crisis, TRIPS-plus measures have been adopted by some member states. To remove any barriers obstructing access to medicines, the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health and the WTO 2005 Ministerial Declaration introducing Art. 31bis in the TRIPS Agreement were implemented. For fostering better protection, preferential trade agreements (PTA) have also been concluded, of which the Trans-Pacific Partnership and later, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) have been adopted.



What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)?

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is essentially a Trade Agreement that is wide in scope to include within its ambit twelve Pacific Rim countries, inclusive of the United States. The Agreement was the master plan of US President Barack Obama; however, it lingered on until Trump assumed presidentship. Due to Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the world's largest free trade deal, which comprised about forty percent of the entire global economy, the other eleven countries moved ahead while embracing a few changes in the original deal. The new deal came to be known as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

The TRIPS Agreement provided for minimum and common standards of protection of IPRs. It also provided that any additional protection may be afforded to complement the provisions within it. In such light came the TPP, which contained provisions on patentability, patent extension, test data exclusivity, and patent linkage that could adversely affect access to medicines. It had the following characteristic features:

  • It broadened the protection for smell, sound, and color trademarks. It also limited marking to protect the use of common food names.
  • It gave additional protection to the trade secrets by proposing criminal sanctions for cyber theft and theft of other trade secrets.
  • It extended protection over undisclosed test data submitted for regulatory approval of pharmaceutical, agrochemical, or biological patents.
  • It also emphasized that the term of protection for copyright shall be set to a minimum of seventy years after the life term of the author of the original work.
  • It also expressed that the patents surrounding biotechnology shall be given extended protection since a majority of the patent term is lost in getting prior approval. Thus, for pharmaceuticals, at least five years of protection shall be mandated, and for agrochemical, the duration shall be at least ten years.

Delving into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) or the TPP11 is a trade agreement between eleven countries, namely, Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam, marking up to 13 percent of the world's Gross Domestic Production (GDP).

The CPTPP can be realized as an improvement of the TPP Agreement since it sought to regain a balance in the provisions dealing with IPRs to serve good not only to the interest the United States may have had but also to the other eleven members. It contains a comprehensive chapter on IPRs that establishes the standard of protection of IPRs across the Asia-Pacific region at a regional scale. It aims to provide for a common set of IPR rules to encourage investment and procuration of new ideas and cater to the growth of creative and innovative industries while also addressing the issue of piracy and counterfeits. The obligations are introduced in the following areas:

  • In the Field of Patents: The parties to the CPTPP agreed to introduce flexibility provided for in the TPP that allowed patent-term adjustment and its tenure restoration to make good for the delays in obtaining marketing approval. However, it did not define what would constitute an act leading to curtailment of the actual term of the patent, which may lead to ambiguity in the enforcement of such measures. It marks the first Free Trade Agreement (FTA) to have included biologics within its ambit to ensure a longer duration (05years/07years) of protection in line with its objective to ensure data exclusivity.
  • In the Field of Copyright: It suspended the obligations provided for in the TPP concerning the term of copyright and related rights. It also suspended the provision dealing with the payment on copyright and related rights, the provision on technological protection measures, and rights management information. The CPTPP also agreed to suspend the provision concerning encryption programs carrying satellite and cable systems. Therefore, the CPTPP does not require Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to monitor, report, or penalize Copyright Infringement.

The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Public Health

The major impact of CPTPP is aimed at public health and nutrition, thereby aiming to promote access to medicines. It impacted innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. The key features that facilitate access to health and the facilities thereof are as follows:

1. Patentability Criteria:

In addition to the requirement of the invention being new, involving an inventive step, and having some industrial utility, there are a few additions required to be made in a signatory's domestic legislation. Parties are required to make patents available for either of the following if not all:

  • New uses of a known product;
  • New methods of using a known product; or
  • New processes of using a known product.

It enhances the scope of protection, which may be available to pharmaceuticals.

2. Redefining Pharmaceutical Patents:

Concerning pharmaceuticals, a new pharmaceutical product means a "product not containing a chemical entity previously approved in a member state." It also provides that any unnecessary delays in seeking the approval of pharmaceuticals shall be avoided, and therefore, such measures shall be adopted that would help expedite the processing of marketing approvals.

3. Provision Regarding Test Data Exclusivity:

For maintaining the test data exclusivity, the Partnership Agreement provides that such information shall be safeguarded from any third person who has not obtained the consent of the originator of such information to market the invention or a similar product for at least five years. 

It may have significant loopholes and pitfalls in addition to the possible gains since, on the one hand, it enables and furthers the idea of public health by ascertaining Patent Protection in favor of the patent holder; however, it may prevent or delay the entry of generics. The few takeaways of the CPTPP are summarized below:

  • Low Patentability Standards - It is also known as secondary patenting. Such low standards may be alarming as one single Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) or product may be protected by several patents.
  • Patent extension guarantees that there is no adverse impact of delayed implementation of patents. However, if the term of the original patent is extended by such a partnership agreement, the availability of low-cost generic products may be delayed. Also, such a provision will not enable any improvement for developing countries having unequipped Patent Offices.
  • The provision of patent linkage that provides a member party with the option to deny the generic version to market the patented product where the same is in force unless the act is authorized by the patent holder can be observed as the grant of additional protection to pharmaceutical companies against generics. It may, on the one hand, hamper the introduction of generics into the mainstream market, while on the other hand, it may also prevent substandard products from entering the market by regulating effective control. Furthermore, it may also slow down the Patent System by enforcing stringent measures to curb Patent Infringements, which may not work in favor of developing countries.

Concluding Remarks

The CPTPP is a TRIP-plus standard that has practical implications on the member states. However, since the CPTPP is an agreement laying common grounds, it may act as a level playing field. It would be interesting to observe in the coming years how such preferential trade agreements turn out to be in the long run in their endeavors of achieving healthy and affordable medicines since it is clear how the entry of generics and biosimilars may be delayed. The cost of enforcement may be affordable for developed nations, but it may be an additional challenge for other signatories.

Monday, August 24, 2020

What Impact Does a Patent Race have on Innovation?

 When we talk about patents, timing undoubtedly matters. In case two inventors are working on the same invention, then the one who reaches the Patent Office first holds the upper hand. The best example of a patent race is - Elisha Gray and Alexander Graham Bell filing the Patent Application for the telephone on the same day. Bell received the patent, started a successful company, and is now synonymous with the telephone; on the other hand, only a few people remember Gray. For quite a while now, economists have been using patent races as a classic example of how firms innovate in a highly competitive environment. Let us now gain more valuable insight into the role of a patent race in the real world.


Winning the Patent Race

It is a matter of fact that yes - a patent office keeps the patent applications secret for sometime after they are filed. The same implies that two companies or firms may end up filing a patent application for the same innovation while not realizing that the other also filed. As per various reports and surveys conducted, a patent race has a significant impact on innovation both in terms of magnitude and direction. Winners, in this aspect, do 14% more follow-on innovation, and losers, in contrast, are near about three times as likely to abandon their innovation. The ones that keep going have to invent around and find some other technical paths to overcome or avoid the patent coverage of the winner.

If we consider the importance of winning a patent race, it won't be surprising to learn that firms in highly contested technology areas (where a patent race is frequent) do more R&D and file many patent applications. Furthermore, they usually patent in smaller steps instead of waiting until bigger milestones are achieved.

Who all are running in the Patent Race?

The patent racing behavior is surprisingly frequent - with somewhere around 10-11% of all the patents becoming a part of the race. In a few technology areas, a patent race occurs even more frequently; for instance, 13% of the patents in communications are in a patent race and 16% in computing, while, in comparison, only 5% of the patents in biotechnology are there in a patent race. There are various reasons, which explain the frequency of patent racing in these areas. In general, the patents in communications and computing are considered weaker, in contrast to the ones in biotechnology. Moreover, companies in fields like biotechnology avoid entering a patent race by either collaborating with the competitors or researching the already existing areas to minimize the risk of paying for expensive medical trials. To be specific, they don't wish to end up without patent coverage.

Bottom Line

All the points mentioned above prove that a patent race is indeed prevalent in the real world and is crucial for innovation. Without any second thoughts, winning a patent race protects the innovators, which, in turn, enables them to take their research agenda to the next level. On the other hand, a patent race deflects the losers, causing them to do less follow-on work and having to 'invent around' the winners.

Ref: https://www.kashishworld.com/blog/what-impact-does-a-patent-race-have-on-innovation/ 

Friday, July 19, 2019

Shinhan Card Patents Blockchain Credit System


Shinhan Card, South Korea's biggest credit card company, has been recently granted a patent for a blockchain-based payment system. According to the reports, the company has developed a blockchain-powered credit transaction process that offers credit card functionality along with setting spending limits, making monthly installments, and carrying out payments. On this achievement, the company's official stated that the services using the key features and functions of credit cards would be extended to this blockchain payments system. The official further mentioned that the blockchain payments system is a noteworthy advancement from the status quo, where most blockchain-based services were restricted to cash writing or user identification of online transactions.


The company has patented the blockchain system about 18 months after carrying out a feasibility study, which examined how efficient the technology would be in offering the kind of functionality sought initially.  

As per the reports, the patent could soon permit cardless credit transactions that would see many users of this the system in making payments via apps on their smartphones. With such kind of development, the traditional card system based on three intermediaries, namely, the credit card firm, value-added network service provider (VAN), and the payment gateway would be disrupted immensely.
This technology has come on the heels of a new platform set up by the parent company to the Shinhan Card, known as Shinhan Financial Group. This year in May, they had unveiled a new blockchain-based platform speeding up the loan process by verifying the necessary terms to approve credit lending.
Shinhan Card is now expected to expand the patent beyond South Korea and has already filed a Patent Application the US, Europe, Vietnam, China, and Indonesia. However, the status of those patents at this point is still unknown.

Understanding the Concept of Destination Branding through Trademark Protection

 The hospitality industry of India has undoubtedly become an exceedingly crucial service provider across the nation. Due to the increase in ...